Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9845 (AP)

LT. COL.M.J. NAIDU v. B. CHINNA OBULESH

CC/631/2025 · 2025-06-29

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010109582025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 631/2025 Between: 1. LT. COL.M.J. NAIDU, , S/O. LATE BALARAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, RETIRED ARMY OFFICER, R/O.PLOT NO 42B, BHASKAR RAO NAGAR, SAINIKAPURI, SECUNDERABAD. 2. M.VENKATALAKSHAMMA, , W/O. LATE NAGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS. HOUSE WIFE, R/O.H.NO.3-1-1619, PLOT NO. 3-535, ROAD NO. 16, ADITYA NAGAR, NEW HAFEEZ PET, SERLINGAMPALLY MANDAL, RANGA REDDY DISTRICT. 3. . M. NAGA SATYAM,, S/O. LATE JAYA RAMAIAH, AGED 62 YEARS. AGRICULTURISTS, R/O. YERRABALEM VILLAGE, CUMBUM MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. . M. RAMA DEVI,, W/O. LATE M. BALA NAGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS. HOUSE WIFE, R/O.MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. M.BALA SUBBAIAH, , S/O. JAYARAMAIAH, AGED 57 YEARS. AGRICULTURISTS, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT YERRABALEM, CUMBUM MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 6. . M. RAMAIAH,, S/O. BALAIAH, AGED 62 YEARS. BANK EMPLOYEE, R/O.GAJWEL MANDAL, SIDDIPET DISTRICT. 7. M.SATYANARAYANA,, S/O.M.BALAIAH, AGED 58 YEARS. AGRICULTURISTS, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT YERRABALEM, CUMBUM MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 8. M. VENKATESWARLU,, S/O. PEDANARAYANA, AGED 61 YEARS, AGRICULTURISTS, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT YERRABALEM, CUMBUM MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. Page 2 of 5 SRS,J C.C.No.631 of 2025 9. M.NAGESWARI,, W/O. SIVARAM PRASAD, AGED 50 YEARS. HOUSE WIFE, R/O. HYDERABAD. 10. . M.CHAKRAPANI PRASAD,, S/O. LATE NARAYANA SWAMY, AGED 58 YEARS. GOVERNMENT SERVICE, R/O.GIDDALURU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 11. M. SRINIVASALU,, S/O. SURTYANARAYANA, AGED 58 YEARS. RETIRED IN CRPF, R/0.H.N0.8-4-369/PN/GF-2, BLOCK NO.38, AZAM NAGAR, SIDE-111, NRR PURAM, BORBANDA, HYDERABAD. 12. MAMILLA CHINNA VENKATA RAMANA,, S/O. SURYANARAYANA, AGED 55 YEARS, R/O.14-1-211/621/16, PARAVATH NAGAR, ALLAPUR, BORBAND, HYDERABAD. 13. . M.V.MOHAN RAJA,, S/O. LAKSHMI NARAYANA AGED 57 YEARS. GOVERNMENT SERVICE, R/O.MARKAPUR MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 14. M.CHALAPATHI,, S/O. LAKSHMI NARAYANA, AGED 56 YEARS. MEDICAL PRACTITIONER, R/O.HOUSE NO.104A, 10TH WARD, NEAR JAGADHESWAR THEATRE, MARKAPUR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 15. . M.VENU GOPAL,, S/O. LATE CHINNA NARAYANA, AGED 51 YEARS. MEDICAL PRACTITIONER, R/O.HOUSE NO.3-160, NEAR PEDA RAMALAYAM GUDI, CHARLAGUDIPADU POST, GURAJALA MANDAL. GUNTUR DISTRICT. (PETITIONERS 2 TO 15 ARE REPRESENTED BY GPA HOLDER LT.COL.M.J.NAIDU, S/O.LATEBALARAMAIAH, THE 1ST PETITIONER HEREIN) ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. B CHINNA OBULESH, District Revenue Officer and Additional District Magistrate, Prakasam District, at Ongolu. ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondent herein for willfully, deliberately and SRS,J C.C.No.631 of 2025 intentionally disobeying the orders passed in W.P.No. 7678/2024 dated 28- 03-2024 by his lordship Sri Justice Subba Reddy Satti and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. S V R SUBRAHMANYAM Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. K M KRISHNA REDDY The Court made the following order: Heard Sri Harinath Reddy Somagutta, learned counsel representing Sri S.V.R. Subrahmanyam, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Dileep Nayak, learned counsel, representing Sri K.M. Krishna Reddy, learned counsel for the respondent. 2. The above contempt case is filed complaining of non-implementation of the order dated 28.03.2024 in W.P.No.7678 of 2024. 3. The aforementioned writ petition was disposed of, directing the Sub- Collector, Markapuram Division, to transmit the appeal papers filed by the petitioners to the learned Divisional Revenue Officer, Prakasam District, within three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. On such transmission of papers, the learned Divisional Revenue Officer was directed to dispose of the appeal, strictly as per law, as expeditiously as possible. 4. Since the order was not complied with, the above contempt case is filed. 5. Learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the District Revenue Officer and Additional District Magistrate, Prakasam District, Ongole, passed a speaking order on 25.03.2025 in R.P.No.D.Dis.D7/446/2024. SRS,J C.C.No.631 of 2025 6. Learned counsel for the petitioners endorsed the same. 7. Recording the submissions of learned counsel on either side, since the order dated 28.03.2024 is complied with, this contempt case is closed. No costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 30.06.2025 IKN SRS,J C.C.No.631 of 2025 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE No.631 of 2025 Date: 30.06.2025 IKN