Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 98433 (MAD)

Selvaganapathy, v. The State Rep by, Inspector of Police,

CRL OP/24553/2025 · 2025-09-09

T V Thamilselvi

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 24553 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-09-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI CRL OP No. 24553 of 2025 1. Selvaganapathy, S/o. Balu, KMT Nagar, Nangavalli, Mettur Taluk, Salem District. Petitioner(s) Vs 1.The State Rep by, Inspector of Police, Nangavalli Police Station, Salem District. (Crime No. 252/2025) Respondent(s) PRAYER To enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No. 252 of 2025 on the file of the Respondent. For Petitioner(s): C.Deepak kumar For Respondent(s): Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.Side) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 24553 of 2025 ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 09.08.2025 for the alleged offences under Sections 296(b), 118(1) of BNS @ 296(b), 105 of BNS, in Crime No.252 of 2025, on the file of respondent police, seeks bail. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there was a family dispute regarding the division of property. On that day, a wordy quarrel took place, after which the deceased recovered. She did not sustain any grievous injuries, and she later died due to some other ailment. However, the petitioner has been falsely implicated as if he had committed the murder of the deceased. Hence, he prayed for bail. 3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that there are a total of three accused in this case, in which the petitioner has been arrayed as A1. He further submitted that a wordy quarrel occurred on that day, and due to the family dispute, the deceased was brutally attacked by the three accused. Out https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 24553 of 2025 of them, only A1 has been secured, while A2 and A3 are still absconding. Therefore, the case is still under investigation. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant bail to the petitioner. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances, that the investigation is not yet completed, at this stage, if he is released on bail, he may abscond, tamper with the evidence, and hamper the witnesses. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 09-09-2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No rri https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 24553 of 2025 To 1.The State Rep by, Inspector of Police, Nangavalli Police Station, Salem District. (Crime No. 252/2025) 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 24553 of 2025 T.V.THAMILSELVI J. rri CRL OP No. 24553 of 2025 09-09-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis