Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 98429 (ALL)

RAHISA BEGUM v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/33093/2025 · 2025-09-18

Amitabh Kumar Rai, Saral Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33093 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to some defects in the writ petiton the petitioner does not want to press the present writ petition and prays that the same may be dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. September 19, 2025 Sumaira Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Krishna Murari Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Rahisa Begum .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SUMAIRA AQUIL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad