HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32977 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard Sri V.K. Baranwal, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that respondent-authority has withheld payment of admitted amount to the petitioner. In respect to his grievances, petitioner has submitted several representations to the respondent-authority, but respondent-authority is not paying any heed to the request of the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction may be issued to the respondent no. 3 to consider the grievance of the petitioner. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without adverting into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed off permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation along with certified copy of this order raising all his grievances before the respondent no. 3, Executive Engineer, Sharda Sahayak Khand-36, Jaunpur within a period of one month from today. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent no.3 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law after giving due notice and opportunity of hearing to the petitioner within a period of two months thereafter from the date he receives the representation of the petitioner. September 19, 2025 Gaurav Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : V.K. Baranwal Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Samarnath Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad