Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9842 (RAJ)

SMT SITA AND ANR v. R S R T C AND ANR

CW/13484/2012 · 2025-03-10

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13484/2012 1. Smt. Sita W/o Late Shri Narayan Vyas, Near Krishna Dharmshala, Diggi, Tehsil Malpura, Distt. Tonk, Rajasthan. 2. Mukesh Kumar Vyas S/o Late Shri Narayan Vyas, Near Krishna Dharmshala, Diggi, Tehsil Malpura, Distt. Tonk, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation Through Chairman Cum Managing Director, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur. 2. Chief Manager, Rajasthan State Road, Transport Corpora- tion, Bundi Depot, Tonk. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akshit Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Yash Joshi HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 10/03/2025 The present petition is filed seeking directions for grant of compassionate appointment and reimbursement of medical ex- penses. Withal, the impugned order dated 17.01.2012 is assailed. The following prayers are made by the counsel representing the petitioner: ‘(i) The impugned inaction of the respondent in reimbursing bill for medical expenses of angiogra- phy of Rs.1,30,000/- of late Shri Narayan Vyas may kindly be declared illegal and arbitrary and therefore, same may kindly be quashed and set aside. (ii) The respondents may kindly be directed by is- suing by writ of mandamus, order, direction in the (2 of 2) [CW-13484/2012] nature thereof, to reimburse medical expenses of Rs.1,30,000/- alongwith interest @ 18% per an- num to the petitioners; (iii) The impugned order dated 17.01.2012 may kindly be declared illegal and arbitrary and there- fore, may kindly be quashed and set aside. (iv) The respondents may kindly be directed by is- suing by writ of mandamus, order direction in the nature thereof, to give appointment to petitioner no.2 on compassionate basis with all consequen- tial benefits in the interest of justice. (v) Any other appropriate order or direction which this Hon’ble Court deems just and proper in the facts and circumstances of this case may kindly also be passed in favour of the petitioner.’ Considering the arguments made by respective parties and taking note of the fact that the present petition pertains to the year 2012 after which much water has flown, this Court directs the petitioner to file a representation before the competent au- thority/respondents, who shall adjudicate the same by way of a speaking order, strictly in accordance with law. The instant petition is accordingly disposed of. Pending appli- cation(s), if any, shall stand disposed. (SAMEER JAIN),J Diksha/79