Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 98400 (ALL)

RAJPAL v. State of UP AND ANOTHER

WRIC/34324/2024 · 2025-05-06

S Q H Rizvi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:74095 Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 34324 of 2024 Petitioner :- Rajpal Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Brij Lal Jha,Sitaram Patel Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J. 1. Shri Sitaram Patel, learned counsel for petitioner and Shri Amrish Kumar Tiwari, learned Standing Counsel on behalf of State respondents are present. 2. The learned counsel for petitioner at the very outset submitted that the dispute involved in the writ petition is of private nature and against the private individuals and as such he does not want to press the present writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, however, he prays for liberty to the petitioner to avail remedy as available under the common law. 3. The writ petition is accordingly consigned to records with the liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent court of law for redressal of his grievances in accordance with law. Order Date :- 7.5.2025 Nadeem Digitally signed by :- NADEEM AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad