Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9840 (HP)

SHER SINGH v. THE HPSFC AND OTHERS

CWP/5012/2025 · 2025-04-08

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP Nos.5012 & 5014 of 2025 Decided on: 8th April, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CWP No.5012 of 2025 Sher Singh …..Petitioner Versus H.P. State Forest Corporation and another .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. CWP No.5014 of 2025 Laxman Dass …..Petitioner Versus H.P. State Forest Corporation and another .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Bonit Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Vijay Kumar Arora, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Lalita Sharma D.S. Kainthla, Advocate. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Ms. Lalita Sharma and Mr. D.S. Kainthla, learned Counsel, appear and waive service of notice on behalf 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. - 2 - of the respondents in the respective petitions. 2. Petitioners are serving in the respondent-H.P. State Forest Development Corporation and have prayed for direction to the respondents to grant them work-charge status/regularization of services from the date they completed eight years of service with all incidental benefits. 3. Learned counsel for the parties have jointly submitted that the issue involved in the writ petitions and the reliefs prayed for by the petitioners are now covered by the decision rendered by the Hon’ble Apex Court in The State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. Versus Surajmani & Anr.2. The respondent-Corporation was also the appellant before the Hon’ble Supreme Court in some of the connected matters. Learned counsel for the parties also submit that these writ petitions be disposed of in terms of the aforesaid decision. 4. In view of the stand taken by learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the aforesaid judgment, these writ petitions are disposed of with direction to the respondents/Competent Authority to consider the case(s) of the petitioners in accordance with law laid down in Surajmani2 and pass accordingly appropriate orders in 2 Civil Appeal No.1595 of 2025, decided alongwith connected appeals on 06.02.2025 - 3 - accordance with law within six weeks from today. Copy of order so passed be also communicated to the petitioners. The writ petitions stand disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua April 8, 2025 Judge R.Atal