Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Meghalaya · body

2025 DAILYLAW 984 (MEG)

IMZANUR HOQUE @ SRI SANIDUL @ INJAMUL HOQUE AND 2 ORS. v. STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ANR.

AB/15/2025 · 2025-07-31

W Diengdoh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 Serial No. 03 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG AB. No. 15 of 2025 Date of Decision: 31.07.2025 1. Imzanur Hoque @ Sri. Sanidul @ Injamul Hoque, aged about 21 years, S/o Sopior Rahman, R/o Margaon Janta, Kalapani, P.S. Mancachar, District South Salmara Mancachar, Assam. 2. Md. Robial Hoque Mondol @ Robial Ali Mondol, aged about 24 years, S/o Roshid Mondol, R/o Margaon Janta, Kalapani, P.S. Mancachar, District South Salmara Mancachar, Assam. 3. Babu Sk @ Sri. Babu Ali @ Babu Mollha, aged about 23 years, S/o Omar Ali, R/o Vill- Teporpara, P.S. Mancachar, District South Salmara Mancachar, Assam …….. Petitioners - Vs- 1. State of Meghalaya, represented by the Learned Public Prosecutor. 2. Shri. X, Son of Y, R/o Z. …….. Respondents Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) : Mr. M.A. Choudhury, Adv. Mr. M.R. Marak, Adv. vice 2025:MLHC:661 2 Mr. A. Ahmed, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. S. Sengupta, Addl. PP with Mr. J.N. Rynjah, GA. i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc.: ii) Whether approved for publication in press: Yes/No JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL) 1. Mr. M.A. Choudhury, learned counsel appears on behalf of the petitioners. 2. However, at the outset, Mr. S. Sengupta, learned Addl. PP on behalf of the State respondent has submitted that pursuant to this Court’s order dated 22.07.2025, the petitioners have cooperated with the investigation, and has appeared before the Investigating Officer. As instructed by the Investigating officer, it appears that there is no requirement for custodial questioning of the petitioners. In such a circumstance, the learned Addl. PP has not made any strong objection for the application to be allowed and the interim relief be made absolute. 3. Accordingly, on consideration of such submission, the prayer made in this application is hereby allowed. 4. In the event of their arrest, the petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail with the following conditions: 2025:MLHC:661 3 i) That they shall not abscond or tamper with the evidence and witnesses; ii) That they shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when required; iii) That they shall not leave the jurisdiction of the State of Assam without prior permission of the court concerned; and iv) That they shall bind themselves on a personal bond of ₹ 30,000/- (Rupees thirty thousand) each with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court. 5. The interim bail granted is hereby made absolute. 6. Application disposed of. Judge 2025:MLHC:661 Digitally signed by DARIKORDOR NARY Date: 2025.07.31 17:43:21 IST