Chotu Ram @ Chotu Rama @ Ghanthu Rama v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./49175/2025 · 2025-07-28
Chandra Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 98384 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 98384 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49175 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-133 Year-2025 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Supaul ======================================================
1. Chotu Ram @ Chotu Rama @ Ghanthu Rama S/O Kamal Ram R/O Ward No 7, Jolhaniyan, PS- Pipra, District- Supaul
2. Bishundeo Kumar S/O Shiv Narayan Mandal R/O Ward No 6, Jolhaniyan, PS- Pipra, District- Supaul
3. Dinesh Mandal S/O Domi Mandal R/O Ward No 6, Jolhaniyan, PS- Pipra, District- Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vivek Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Pramod Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 28-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Excise Case No. 754 of 2025 arising out of Supaul Excise P.S. Case No. 133 of 2025 dated 08.05.2025 registered for the offences punishable u/s 30(a), 32 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, total 756 litres of illicit country made liquor was recovered from the Scorpio. It is further alleged that 108 litres of illicit Nepali Soufi liquor was recovered for the straw. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49175 of 2025(2) dt.28-07-2025 2/2 that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioners have no concerned with the said vehicle. The petitioners have no concern with the alleged recovery. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner no. 1 and 3 have clean antecedent and the petitioner no. 2 has one criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioners are in custody since 09.05.2025. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioners. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioners above-named, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Supaul in connection with Excise Case No. 754 of 2025 arising out of Supaul Excise P.S. Case No. 133 of 2025. 7.
The application stands allowed. guddukr/- (Chandra Prakash Singh, J) U T