Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 98378 (PNJ)

SARABJEET SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRM-M/50181/2025 · 2025-09-08

Surya Partap Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 126 CRM-M-50181-2025 Date of decision : 08.09.2025 SARABJEET SINGH ...... PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ...... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present : Mr. Jatinder Pal Singh, Advocate & Mr. Tejbir Singh Hundal, Advocate for the petitioner. ***** SURYA PARTAP SINGH . J.(Oral) 1. The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner for directions to the respondents No.2 to 4 not to harass the petitioner and his family members, and that the respondents No.2 to 4 be restrained from conducting unauthorized raids/searches at the house of petitioner, for arresting Manpreet Singh @ Mani Bhinder. 2. The learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed a representation dated 25.07.2025 (Annexure P-3) before the respondent No.2-The Senior Superintendent of Police, Moga. The learned counsel prays for directions to the respondent No.2 to decide the abovementioned representation within a stipulated time. 3. Notice of motion. VIPIN KUMAR 2025.09.10 10:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order CRM-M-50181-2025 2 4. Since advance notice has already been served upon the State, Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of respondents-State, and waives service. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a direction for deciding the representation of the petitioner (Annexure P-3) be given to the respondent No.2 and that the instant petition be disposed of accordingly. 6. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.-2-The Senior Superintendent of Police, Moga to pass a speaking order and decide the representation of the petitioner (Annexure P-3) on its own merits, as per law, within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 7. It is, however, made clear that no finding with regard to merits of the allegations is being recorded vide instant order, and the police authorities shall be at liberty to take an independent decision with regard to contents of the representation. (SURYA PARTAP SINGH) JUDGE 08.09.2025 vipin Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether Reportable : No VIPIN KUMAR 2025.09.10 10:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order