Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 98373 (ALL)

ONKAR NATH TIWARI AND ANOTHER v. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER 1ST AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/33145/2025 · 2025-09-18

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33145 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer: "A. Issue writ, order or direction, in the nature of Mandamus commanding/directing the Respondent No. 1 (Additional Commissioner Ist Prayagraj Region Prayagraj) to decide the Revision No. 1799 of 2017 (Computetized Case No. C201702001799) (Onkar Nath Tiwari and another Vs. Smt. Usha Devi and others), Under Section 219 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901, which is pending before him from year 2017 to till date, early as soon as possible within stipulated time fixed by this Hon'ble Court in the interest of justice." 2. It is contended that Revision No.1799 of 2017 (Computerized Case No.C201702001799) under Section 219 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901 is pending consideration before respondent no.1- Additional Commissioner Ist Prayagraj Region Prayagraj. The sole prayer made in the writ petition is to expeditiously decide the said revision. 3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending or issuing notice to the private respondents, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit, with a direction upon respondent no.1- Additional Commissioner Ist Prayagraj Region Prayagraj to decide the Revision No.1799 of 2017 (Computerized Case No.C201702001799) under Section 219 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 4. With the aforesaid direction, present writ petition stands disposed of. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merit. September 19, 2025 SK Goswami Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Sajivan Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Onkar Nath Tiwari And Another .....Petitioner(s) Additional Commissioner 1st And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad