Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 98370 (PNJ)

MANMOHAN SINGH @ TENI v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

CRM-M/53438/2024 · 2025-07-10

Amarjot Bhatti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

125 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-53438-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 10.07.2025 MANMOHAN SINGH @ TENI ....Petitioner Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE AMARJOT BHATTI Present:- Mr. Parveen Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Nidhi Garg, AAG, Haryana. ***** AMARJOT BHATTI, J. Petitioner has filed instant petition for quashing of FIR No.150 dated 29.06.2022 under Sections 376 (2) (f), 376 (2) (n), 323, 506 of IPC registered at Police Station City Safidon, District Jind and subsequent proceedings being abuse of process of law. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner states that he has instructions to withdraw present petition seeking quashing of aforesaid FIR with liberty to take all the defences available to him before the trial Court. 3. Learned counsel representing State states that challan is already presented. Charges have been framed and now case is pending for prosecution evidence. 4. In view of the aforesaid statement, petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. SANDEEP KUMAR 2025.07.11 10:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-53438-2024 (O&M) -2- 5. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand disposed of accordingly as well. (AMARJOT BHATTI) (AMARJOT BHATTI) (AMARJOT BHATTI) (AMARJOT BHATTI) JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE 10.07.2025 snd Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No SANDEEP KUMAR 2025.07.11 10:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document