Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9836 (GAU)

JOYDEV DAS @ JOYDEB DAS v. UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS.

WP(C)/2071/2020 · 2025-04-02

Malasri Nandi, Manash Ranjan Pathak

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010063942020 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2071/2020 JOYDEV DAS @ JOYDEB DAS S/O- LT. MONA DAS @ MANNA @ MANA @ MONNA DAS, R/O- MIKIRBHETA, P.O. AND P.S. MIKIRBHETA, DIST- MORIGAON, ASSAM. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS. REP. BY THE MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NEW DELHI, PIN- 110001. 2:THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM HOME DEPTT. DISPUR GHY.-06. 3:ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA NIRVACHAN SADAN ASOKA ROAD NEW DELHI PIN- 110001. 4:THE STATE CO-ORDINATOR NATIONAL REGISTER OF CITIZENS (NRC) ASSAM ACHYUT PLAZA (1ST FLOOR) BHARALUPAR BHANGAGARH GUWAHATI- 781005. 5:DY. COMMISSIONER MORIGAON DIST- MORIGAON Page No.# 2/3 ASSAM PIN- 782105. 6:THE SUPDT. OF POLICE (B) MORIGAON PIN- 782105. 7:THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE MIKIRBHETA POLICE STATION MORIGAON ASSAM. PIN- 782105 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D R GOGOI, MR. P J MEDHI,MS. S E AHMED Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT.S.G.I., SC, F.T,SC, NRC,SC, ECI BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI 03/04/2025 (M.R. Pathak, J) No representation on behalf of the petitioner on call, though names of three counsel have been reflected in the cause list. 2. Heard Mr. P K Medhi, learned Central Government Counsel for the respondent No. 1; Mr. G Sarma, learned Standing counsel, Home and Political Department, Assam as well as Standing Counsel, NRC, Assam for the respondent Nos. 2, 4, 6 & 7; Mr. H Kuli, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. A I Ali, learned Standing counsel, Election Commission of India for the respondent No. 3 and Mr. P Sharma, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent No. 5. 3. It is seen that consecutively even on the last occasion, the petitioner remained unrepresented that can be seen from the orders dated 17.11.2021 and 18.03.2025. 4. Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. 5. The interim protection given to the petitioner earlier on 17.11.2021 stands vacated. Page No.# 3/3 6. Registry shall communicate this order to the Foreigners Tribunal No.3rd, Morigaon forthwith and shall also return the records of Case No. F.T. 3/2015 and Case No. F.T. (D) 17/2016 to the Foreigners Tribunal No. 3rd, Morigaon, Assam that were called for by order dated 12.06.2020. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant