Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 98347 (ALL)

SMT. KANEEJ FATIMA AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

WRIC/34044/2025 · 2025-09-24

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 34044 of 2025 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:- "a) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction to quash the order dated 13.09.2024 passed by the Court of Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Division Prayagraj in Revision No. 1943 of 2024 whereby the Court rejected the stay application and further direct the and further direct b) Issue direction to the Respondents to not change the nature of the Arazi no. 114 area 0.070 Hectare which is Banjar Bhumi/Gram Sabha land. c) Issue direction to Respondents no. 3-8 to not construct any structure over the Arazi no. 114 area 0.070 Hectare which is Banjar Bhumi/Gram Sabha land. d) Issue direction to the Respondents to maintain status quo over the Arazi no. 114 area 0.070 Hectares which is Banjar Bhumi/Gram Sabha land. e) Issue direction no. 2 to expeditiously decide the Revision no. 1943 of 2024 pending in the Court of Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Division Prayagraj." 2. Prayer nos. (a) to (e) made in the writ petition cannot be granted as revision is already pending consideration before Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Division, Prayagraj. 3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akhilendra Singh, Ramanuj Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : Azad Rai, C.S.C. Smt. Kaneej Fatima And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon respondent no. 2 to decide the Revision no. 1943 of 2024, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 4. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. September 25, 2025 V.S.Singh WRIC No. 34044 of 2025 2 (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad