RAJIV THAKUR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HP AND OTHERS
CWP/2179/2023 · 2025-03-22
Sandeep Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9833 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9833 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.2179 of 2023
Date of Decision: 22.3.2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Rajiv Thakur ……...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors.
…....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?
For the Petitioner: Mr. Mohit Thakur, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. ___________________________________________________________________________
Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)
While placing on record copy of Office Order dated 7.8.2024, issued by Director (Higher Education), Himachal Pradesh, whereby pay of the petitioner has been re-fixed, learned counsel for the petitioner states that present petition has been rendered infructuous.
2.
Consequently, in view of the above, present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. All pending applications also stand disposed of accordingly.
March 22, 2025
(Sandeep Sharma), (manjit)
Judge