Smt. Deva Adi Venkata Lakshmi Narasamamba v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/4959/2019 · 2025-07-31
B V L N Chakravarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9833 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9833 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010109512019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 4959/2019
Between:
1. SMT. DEVA ADI VENKATA LAKSHMI NARASAMAMBA, W/O LATE NARAYANA SWAMY, AGED 65 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEW FE, R/O BHOGAPURAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. PRESENTLY R/O FLAT NO. 406, MA ILLU APARTMENT, DCCB COLONY, SANAVEDI, SRIKAKULAM SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRAPRADESH. 2. THE SUPERINTENDET OF POLICE, VIZIANAGARAM, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICE, BOGAPURAM POLICE STATION, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pleased to issue an appropriate
2 writ of mandamus declaring the in action of the respondent particularity 3rd respondent in not registering the crime against the accused on the complaint given by the petitioner vide complaint dated 02-04-2019 as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents particularly 3rd respondent to register the complaint against concern persons and to follow the principles laid down in Lalit Kumari Case (2012 AIR SCW 1831) and according to law
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. CHALLA AJAY KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME (AP)
3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 4959 of 2019 The Court made the following Order:
Sri Challa Ajay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit at this length of time, no further orders are necessary in the present Writ Petition and the same may be closed with a liberty to the petitioner to avail other legal remedies available as per law. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is closed with a liberty to the petitioner to approach the jurisdictional Magistrate for necessary relief in the light of the Judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in M.Subramaniam Vs. S.Janaki and another1. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed.
______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 01.08.2025 PSA
1 2020 (16) SCC 728
4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 4959 of 2019
Date: 01.08.2025 PSA