Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 98327 (ALL)

GANESH JI BARANWAL AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

WRIC/32937/2025 · 2025-09-18

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32937 of 2025 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking the following main prayer:- "A. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus direct to directing to the respondent to pass appropriate order on the application of petitioners so that grievance of the petitioners may be redressed for which applications are pending before him." 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners without entering into merits of the case, made an innocuous prayer that the petitioners may be permitted to file a fresh representation before respondent no.2 and a direction may be issued to him to decide the same in time bound manner. 3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State-respondents vehemently opposed the writ petition on merits, but has not opposed the innocuous prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Sri D.K. Singh, learned Standing Counsel appeared on advance accepted notice on behalf of the State-respondents, perused the contents made in the writ petition and the documents on record. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as no objection made on behalf of learned Standing counsel Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Santosh Kumar Chaubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ganesh Ji Baranwal And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) appearing on behalf of State-respondents. Petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation along with present writ petition as well as certified copy of this order before respondent no.2 within 10 days from the date of production of certified copy of this order. After receiving the said representation, respondent no.2, Assistant Registrar, Chits, Fund and Society, Varanasi Region, Varanasi is directed to decide the said representation after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receiving of the said representation. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. September 19, 2025 Atul WRIC No. 32937 of 2025 2 (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad