Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 98316 (ALL)

SUFIYAN v. STATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

WPIL/3031/2025 · 2025-09-24

Arun Bhansali, Kshitij Shailendra

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 3031 of 2025 Chief Justice's Court HON'BLE ARUN BHANSALI, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA, J. 1. The petition has been filed seeking a direction to respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 4 to remove the illegal encroachment of respondent Nos. 6 to 9 over Arazi No. 274 Kha, area 0.1380 hectare recorded as Pokhri in the revenue record of Village Manpur, Pargna-Chiraiyakot, Tehsil-Muhammdabad Gohna, District-Mau. 2. A perusal of the petition indicates that except for producing the Khatauni and the representaitons made in quick succession from 16.07.2025, nothing has been placed on record to substantiate the allegations made regarding the construction standing/being done at the land recorded as Pokhri. 3. Filing of petitions, which are wholly cursory in nature, only with a view to seek roving inquiry, based on the allegations made, cannot be entertained, the same is, therefore, dismissed. September 25, 2025 Mukesh Pal/Sazia Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shamasul Eslam Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Kushagra Vaibhav Singh (Kshitij Shailendra,J.) (Arun Bhansali,CJ.) Sufiyan .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and 8 others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MUKESH PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad