` CWP-26377-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 120 CWP-26377-2025 Date of Decision: 05.09.2025 Dr. Suresh Kumar Sharma …Petitioner Versus Union Territory of Chandigarh and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: - Ms. Anisha Sharma, Advocate Mr. Harshit Singh, Advocate and Mr. Hari Ram, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Madhu Dayal, Advocate and Ms. Ekakshra Mahajan Mandhar, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr. Sameer Sachdeva, Advocate and Ms. Lishika Mehta, Advocate for respondent Nos.3 and 4 *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking directions to respondent to decide representation dated 12.02.2025 and legal notice dated 20.03.2025. 2. The petitioner is a retired Assistant Professor. He has retired from GGDSD College, Sector 32, Chandigarh. He joined service in 2008 and retired on 31.12.2019. He has served representation and legal notice dated 12.02.2025 and 20.03.2025 respectively upon respondent No.4 with the request to regularize him with retrospective date and revise his pay scale. Respondent No.2-Panjab University, Chandigarh vide communication dated MOHIT KUMAR 2025.09.05 16:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. ` CWP-26377-2025 -2- 07.04.2025 has directed respondent No.4-college to consider petitioner’s claim. 3. Mr. Sameer Sachdeva, Advocate, who is present in Court on behalf of respondent Nos.3 and 4, assures the Court that competent authority would consider and decide representation/legal notice of the petitioner within 3 months from today. 4. In the wake of statement of learned counsel for respondent Nos.3 and 4, the present petition stands disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 05.09.2025 Mohit Kumar Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MOHIT KUMAR 2025.09.05 16:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.