Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 98307 (MAD)

LALITHA MUKUNDAN v. CHENNAI METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

WP/33917/2025 · 2025-09-04

G Arul Murugan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.33917 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 04.09.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN W.P.No.33917 of 2025 and W.M.P.Nos.38049, 38050, 38051 and 38052 of 2025 1. Lalitha Mukundan W/o.P.Mukundan 2. P.Mukundan S/o.Late.G.Parthasarathy Both having address at: 2nd and 3rd Floors, Residency Apartments, No.19/10, Bawa Road, Alwarpet, Chennai-600 018. Petitioners Vs 1.Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority Thalamuthu Natarajan Building, No.1, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai - 600 008 Rep. by its Member Secretary. 2.Greater Chennai Corporation, Having its office at Ripon Building, Poonamallee High Road, Chennai-600 003 Rep. by its Commissioner. Respondents ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.33917 of 2025 PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records of the 1st respondent in issuing the notice dated 24.02.2024 Notice No.EC/S-1/4691/2023 in so far as it relates to the alleged violations against the petitioner and the consequent passing the impugned order dated 05.08.2025 (hand delivered on 12.08.2025) bearing reference No.Order No.EC/S-1/4691/2023 in so far as it relates to the alleged violation attributable to the petitioner and quash the same as arbitrary, illegal and in violation of principles of natural justice, the Town and Country Planning Act. For Petitioners: Mr.R.Parthasarathy Senior Counsel for Mr.Vishnu Mohan For Respondents: Mrs.P.Veena Suresh Standing Counsel for respondent No.1 Mr.A.Arun Babu Standing Counsel for respondent No.2 ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Petition filed challenging the legality and validity of lock and seal order dated 5.8.2025 cannot allowed, because earlier this court, vide order dated 25.4.2025 made in W.P.No.7274 of 2025, issued directions to demolish unauthorised construction/deviations. That petition was filed by the petitioners themselves. Now, the petitioners seek selective implementation of that direction, ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.33917 of 2025 excluding the property owned by them. 2. As the petitioners have not sought any clarification or modification of the order dated 25.4.2025, no relief can be granted. 3. Writ petition is not maintainable and, accordingly, dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. WMP No No.38049 of 2025 filed to permit the petitioners to file a single writ petition is allowed. Other interim applications stand closed. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 04.09.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No sasi ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.33917 of 2025 To: 1.The Member Secretary Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority Thalamuthu Natarajan Building, No.1, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai-600 008. 2.The Commissioner Greater Chennai Corporation, Having its office at Ripon Building, Poonamallee High Road, Chennai-600 003. ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.33917 of 2025 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND G.ARUL MURUGAN,J. (sasi) W.P.No.33917 of 2025 04.09.2025 ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis