DEEPAK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/33529/2025 · 2025-09-22
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 98291 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 98291 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33529 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:
"I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the District Magistrate, Basti to conduct a time-bound enquiry into the illegal and forged entry and thereafter succession order by Kanungo in the revenue record of Gata No.475 Village, Katra, District Basti and take appropriate action including deletion of such entries and disciplinary action against erring officials: II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Basti Sadar to provide certified copies of the mutation orders or basis for the mutation done on 11.07.2024 or take steps to remove illegal entries if no order exists; III. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the District Magistrate, Basti to decide the petitioner's representation dated 06.11.2024, sent via registered post on 07.11.2024, within a fixed time frame as may be deemed just and proper by this Hon'ble Court; (Annexure No.5 to this Writ Petition)."
2. It is contended that proceedings under Section 38 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 are pending consideration before respondent no.2. Prayers made in the writ petition are to expedite the aforesaid proceedings. 3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit, with a direction upon authority concerned to concluded the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Santosh Ratan Pandey, Sunil Kumar Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Deepak Kumar Srivastava .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
proceedings which are pending under Section 38 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 4. It is further directed that in case the application is not in proper shape, petitioner shall file fresh application in proper format. 5. With the aforesaid direction, present writ petition stands disposed of. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merit.
September 23, 2025 SK Goswami WRIC No. 33529 of 2025 2 (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad