Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9829 (JHR)

PRADIP SAINI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./2115/2025 · 2025-08-22

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:24925 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 2115 of 2025 Pradip Saini, aged about 37 years, son of Sri Yogendra Saini, resident of Garmirzapur, Mashila, Sankrail, P.O. Masila, P.S. Sankrail, District- Howrah(West Bengal), ...... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner :Mr. P.S. Dayal, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Lily Sahay, A.P.P. For the Informant : Mr. P.P.N. Roy, Senior Advocate Mr. Pandey Ashok Nath Roy, Advocate 04/ 22.08.2025: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State and learned senior counsel for the informant. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Basal P.S. Case No. 17/2023, corresponding to G.R. Case No. 678 of 2023, registered under sections 407, 467, 468, 471, 379 of the I.P.C., pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Ramgarh. 3. The Co-ordinate Bench of this Court has directed to issue notice upon the informant in view of the fact that petitioner has stated that he will deposit amount of Rs. 5,58,465/- in favour of the informant and in view of that Mr. P.P.N. Roy, learned senior counsel has appeared on behalf of the informant along with Mr. Pandey Ashok Nath Roy. 4. Mr. P.S. Dayal, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that allegations are made of transportation of wire rope through Taneja Roadlines, Chas weighing 24.245 M.T. amounting to Rs. 14,58,465/- wherein it has been alleged that the said wire rope has not reached to its destination and later on it has been illegally sold. He submits that the petitioner happens to be brother of Radhe Shyam Saini and allegations are made against him that said Radhe Shyam Saini with connivance of other accused persons has ( 2025:JHHC:24925 ) sold the wire elsewhere and later on he has been granted regular bail. He submits that so far this petitioner is concerned, this petitioner has already paid Rs. Nine lakh to Taneja Roadlines, Chas who has engaged the truck. He submits that the four months time may kindly be allowed to the petitioner to pay the amount of Rs. 5,58,465/- to the informant. On these grounds, he submits that the petitioner may kindly be provided privilege of anticipatory bail. 5. Mr. P.P.N. Roy, learned senior counsel for the informant on instruction of informant, who is present in the Court, submits that the informant is ready to take the said amount however period of payment is so long that may kindly be reduced. 6. In view of above facts, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner will pay Rs. 1,80,000/- to the informant within two weeks from today, further Rs. 1,80,000/- within one month further thereafter and remaining amount of Rs. 1,98,465/- will be paid by the petitioner further one month thereafter. 7. Learned senior counsel for the informant submits if the petitioner will not comply his undertaking given before this Court, the informant may kindly be provided liberty to move before the Court for cancellation of bail. 8. In course of argument, learned senior counsel for the informant handed over the account number of the informant along with IFSC Code of the Bank and cancelled cheque of the account number to the learned counsel for the petitioner. 9. In view of above facts and considering that petitioner and informant are agree with the aforesaid terms and conditions, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the above named, ( 2025:JHHC:24925 ) petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today and in the event of his surrender / arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Ramgarh, in connection with Basal P.S. Case No. 17/2023, corresponding to G.R. Case No. 678 of 2023, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of B.N.S.S, 2023. 10. This anticipatory bail application is allowed and disposed of. Pending I.A, if any, stands disposed of. ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-