Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 98289 (ALL)

JAGGU ALIAS JAGMOHAN LODHI v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

CRLA/9586/2024 · 2025-09-23

Shekhar Kumar Yadav

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 9586 of 2024 Court No. - 83 HON'BLE SHEKHAR KUMAR YADAV, J. Heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. This application has been filed for quashing of the summoning/cognizance order dated 29.07.2024 passed by learned Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Hamipur in Special Case No. 303 of 2022 (State Vs. Juggu alias Jagmohan Lodhi) arising out of Case Crime No. 513 of 2021, under sections 323, 504 IPC and section 3(2)va, 3(1)r SC/ST Act, P.S. Rath, District Hamirpur. On perusal of the record, the Court finds that the allegations made in the first information report disclose commission of a cognizable offence and those allegations have found support from the material collected during the course of investigation on the basis whereof the police has laid a charge sheet against the appellants.Therefore, prayer for quashing the chargesheet as well as cognizance order stand refused. At this stage, in case appellant appears before the court below within 30 days from today and applies for bail, the same shall be heard and disposed of in accordance with law. in the light of Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another (Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 5191 of 2021, decided on 28.07.2021) has already laid down guidelines for grant of bail, without fettering the discretion of the courts concerned and the statutory provisions governing consideration in grant of bail, no specific direction need be issued by this Court as it is expected that the court concerned will take into consideration the Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Kundan Kumar, Vikram Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Sanjay Kumar Jaggu Alias Jagmohan Lodhi .....Appellant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) necessary guidelines already issued by the Apex court. With the aforesaid observations, the application is disposed off. September 24, 2025 RPD CRLA No. 9586 of 2024 2 (Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.) Digitally signed by :- RATAN PRAKASH DWIVEDI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad