KALINATH v. STATE OF U P THROUGH SECRETARY (REVENUE) AND 7 OTHERS
WRIC/32890/2025 · 2025-09-17
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 98285 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 98285 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32890 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:-
"(i) a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondent Nos. 04/Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Sadar, District Mirzapur not to proceed demarcation proceeding conducted by the Respondent No. 4/Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Sadar, District Mirzapur upon Arazi No. 419 area 0.165 Hectare situated at Barundha Andar (Kachar), Tappa-84, Pargana Kantit, Tehsil Sadar, District Mirzapur during pendency of Appeal filed under section 24(4) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. (ii) a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondent No. 4/Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Sadar, District Mirzapur to remove the stones digging upon Arazi No. 419 area 0.165 Hectare situated at Barundha Andar (Kachar), Tappa-84, Pargana Kantit, Tehsil Sadar, District Mirzapur during pendency of Appeal filed under section 24(4) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. 2006. filed against the order dated 12.03.2025 passed by Respondent No. 4/Sub Divisional Magistrate, Sadar, District Mirzapur in Case No. 10693 of 2022 (Computerized Case No. T202216530110963) (Kalinath and others Vs. State) under section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, so that justice may be done."
2. From the prayer made in the writ petition, no interference can be made while exercising jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
3. However, as the appeal filed by the petitioner under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2206, pending consideration, no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending or calling for the counter affidavit, the writ petition is being disposed of requiring the appellate authority to decide the appeal in accordance with law within a period of two months from the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Minakshi Tripathi, Monarch Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Kalinath .....Petitioner(s) State Of U P Through Secretary (Revenue) And 7 Others .....Respondent(s)
date of production of certified copy of this order.
4. The writ petition stands disposed of. September 18, 2025 A. V. Singh WRIC No. 32890 of 2025 2 (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- AJAY VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad