Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14414 of 2025 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking the following main prayers:-
"(1) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 25.04.2025 passed by Acharya Encharge, Horticulture Special Unit, Banaras Hindu University-Varanasi transferring the petitioner from Women Degree College, Banaras Hindu University, Sector no.1 Varanasi to Rajeev Gandhi South Campus, Barkachha, Banaras Hindu University, Mirzapur. (II) To issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus against the Acharya Encharge, Horticulture Special Unit, Banaras Hindu University to resolve the grievance of the petitioner made by means of the representation dated 10.05.2025, reminder dated 15.05.2025. () To issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus against the Acharya Encharge, Horticulture Special Unit, Banaras Hindu University- Varanasi to take back the petitioner on his post of gardener at Women Degree College, Banaras Hindu University- Varanasi sector no. 1."
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without entering into merits of the case, made an innocuous prayer that the petitioner may be permitted to file a fresh representation before respondent no.4 and a direction may be issued to him to decide the same in time bound manner. 3. Ms. Pooja Agarwal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos.2 to 5 vehemently opposed the writ petition on merits, but has not Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Raj Kumar Dhama, Vinay Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Hem Pratap Singh, Pooja Agarwal Satya Narayan .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
opposed the innocuous prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Ms. Pooja Agarwal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos.2 to 5, perused the contents made in the writ petition and the documents on record. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as no objection made on behalf of learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents.
Petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation along with present writ petition as well as certified copy of this order before respondent no.4 within 15 days from the date of production of certified copy of this order. After receiving the said representation, respondent no.4, Acharya Prabhari Horticulturist Ikai, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receiving of the said representation. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. September 23, 2025 Atul WRIA No. 14414 of 2025 2 (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad