Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 98261 (ALL)

RAJENDRA PRASAD v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/14551/2025 · 2025-09-23

Ajit Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14551 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. By means of present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner has prayed for a writ of mandamus commanding respondent no. 4 to make payment of gratuity alongwith interest . Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has retired on 31.7.2024 but payment of gratuity has yet not been paid. He further submits that no criminal antecedent is pending to the credit of the petitioner. Learned Standing Counsel submits that he has not objection in the event direction is issued to the competent authority to consider and decide the claim of the petitioner in a time bound period provided petitioners moves fresh representation. In view of aforesaid, this petition stands disposed of with direction to the petitioner to move fresh representation before the concerned competent authority, namely respondent no. 4 within a period of four weeks from today and in the event any such representation is moved, respondent no. 4 will look into and consider the representation and dispose of the same within a further period of two months in accordance with law. September 24, 2025 Sanjeev Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vijay Singh Sengar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Ajit Kumar,J.) Rajendra Prasad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SANJEEV RANJAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad