[2025:RJ-JP:24194] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3240/2025 Girdhari S/o Banshilal, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Durjanpura, Police Station Ghatoli, District Jhalawar (Raj.). (Presently Confined in Sub Jail At Aklera). ---Accused/Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajveer Singh Jhala For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakad, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 02/07/2025 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.0062/2025 registered at Police Station Bhalta, District Jhalawar for the offences under Sections 8, 21, 29 of NDPS Act, 1985. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel further submits that the recovered contraband is below commercial quantity. Learned counsel also submits that though petitioner has criminal antecedents of like nature but in both cases the quantity involved is below commercial quantity. Charge-sheet has been filed. Petitioner is behind the bars since 17.02.2025. The trial of [2025:RJ-JP:24194] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3240/2025] the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, hence the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Girdhari S/o Banshilal shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. 7. In the interest of justice, it would be appropriate to direct that in future, if petitioner is found indulged in repeating the similar nature of offences at any point of time, the State would be at liberty to apply for cancellation of bail before the Court below itself. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J AMIT/120