APHC010108162025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] MONDAY ,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 5771/2025 Between: Dollu Sumanth Kumar ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CHILUKURI KARTHIK Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS The Court made the following: 2 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 5771/2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: “to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in refusing to register the gift settlement deed dated 30.08.2023 bearing P.No.30 of 2023 vide Progs. No: Refusal No.07/2023, dated 08.09.2023 as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to provisions of Registration Act, 1908 and Rules made there under, violative of principles of Natural Justice, contrary to the law laid down by this Hon’ble Court and consequently set aside the Progs. No. Refusal No. 07/2023, dated 08.09.2023 issued by the 3rd respondent by directing the 3rd respondent to receive, register and release the gift settlement deed dated 30.08.2023 bearing P.No.30 of 2023 and to pass such other order or orders...” 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in similar circumstances this Court passed an order dated 03.03.2025 in W.P.No.30899 of 2024 and the operative portion of the said order is extracted hereunder: “7. In the above view of the matter, in view of the orders passed in writ petition Nos.9139 of 2012 and 16921 of 2014, this writ petition is disposed of 3 by directing the Registering authorities to find out whether the petitioner or her vendor are parties to the order in CRP No.1147 of 2012 and in case they are not parties, the Registering authority shall process the document in accordance with law and release the same to the petitioner, within a period of six (06) weeks from the date of the receipt of the copy of this order. It is also made clear that the registration so made shall not affect the rights of the parties to the revision nor shall it create rights in favour of any personal except the parties to the document. 8. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. ” 4. Learned Government Pleader for the respondents does not refute the same. 5. In view of the same, for the reasons alike in the aforesaid order, this Writ Petition is also disposed of directing the Registering authorities to find out whether the petitioner or his vendor are parties to the order in CRP No.1147 of 2012 and in case they are not parties, the Registering authority shall process the document in accordance with law and release the same to the petitioner, within a period of six (06) weeks from the date of the receipt of the copy of this order. It is also made clear that the registration so made shall not affect the rights of the parties to the revision nor shall it create rights in favour of any 4 personal except the parties to the document. There shall be no order as to costs. 6. Registry is directed to attach a copy of the order dated 03.03.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.30899 of 2024 to this order. As a sequel miscellaneous application, pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 17.03.2025 TTPPSS 5 186 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 5771 of 2025 17.03.2025 TTPPSS