PARDEEP KUMAR KHANGWAL v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CWP/24838/2023 · 2025-08-05
Aman Chaudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 98243 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 98243 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT
238 (2 cases)
CWP-24838 Pardeep Kumar Khangwal vs.
CWP-3806- Pardeep Kumar Khangwal vs.
CORAM: HON
Present :
AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL)
1.
which extension in service was not granted to the petitioner.
2.
dated 09.01.2024, the petitioner was allowed to continue in service, in view of which he states that the present petition has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of as such.
3.
petitioner to submit a representation any grievance still subsists.
4.
05.08.2025 parveen kumar
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No
Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 238 (2 cases)
24838-2023
Pardeep Kumar Khangwal vs. State of Punjab -2024
Pardeep Kumar Khangwal vs. State of Punjab
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
None for the petitioner. Mr. Satnam Preet Singh Chauhan, DAG, Punjab
AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Prayer made is for quashing the letter dated 31.01.2023, by which extension in service was not granted to the petitioner. Learned State counsel submits that in pursuance of the order dated 09.01.2024, the petitioner was allowed to continue in service, in view of which he states that the present petition has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of as such. Ordered accordingly. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to submit a representation to the respondent any grievance still subsists. Photocopy of this order be placed on the connected file.
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 05.08.2025
f Punjab and Others f Punjab and another BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Satnam Preet Singh Chauhan, DAG, Punjab. the letter dated 31.01.2023, by which extension in service was not granted to the petitioner. Learned State counsel submits that in pursuance of the order dated 09.01.2024, the petitioner was allowed to continue in service, in view of which he states that the present petition has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of as such. However, liberty is granted to the to the respondent-department in case Photocopy of this order be placed on the connected file.
(AMAN CHAUDHARY)
JUDGE
PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.08.05 18:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this
order/judgment.