Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 98243 (PNJ)

PARDEEP KUMAR KHANGWAL v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/24838/2023 · 2025-08-05

Aman Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 238 (2 cases) CWP-24838 Pardeep Kumar Khangwal vs. CWP-3806- Pardeep Kumar Khangwal vs. CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. which extension in service was not granted to the petitioner. 2. dated 09.01.2024, the petitioner was allowed to continue in service, in view of which he states that the present petition has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of as such. 3. petitioner to submit a representation any grievance still subsists. 4. 05.08.2025 parveen kumar Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 238 (2 cases) 24838-2023 Pardeep Kumar Khangwal vs. State of Punjab -2024 Pardeep Kumar Khangwal vs. State of Punjab CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY None for the petitioner. Mr. Satnam Preet Singh Chauhan, DAG, Punjab AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Prayer made is for quashing the letter dated 31.01.2023, by which extension in service was not granted to the petitioner. Learned State counsel submits that in pursuance of the order dated 09.01.2024, the petitioner was allowed to continue in service, in view of which he states that the present petition has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of as such. Ordered accordingly. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to submit a representation to the respondent any grievance still subsists. Photocopy of this order be placed on the connected file. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 05.08.2025 f Punjab and Others f Punjab and another BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Satnam Preet Singh Chauhan, DAG, Punjab. the letter dated 31.01.2023, by which extension in service was not granted to the petitioner. Learned State counsel submits that in pursuance of the order dated 09.01.2024, the petitioner was allowed to continue in service, in view of which he states that the present petition has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of as such. However, liberty is granted to the to the respondent-department in case Photocopy of this order be placed on the connected file. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.08.05 18:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.