[2025:RJ-JP:23659] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3249/2025 Kripal Singh S/o Bhambal, R/o 10, Kheda Rajgarh, Police Station Masalpur, District Karauli (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : None. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shri Ram Dhakar, Public Prosecutor. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL (V. J.) Order 27/06/2025 1. None present on behalf of the accused-petitioner. 2. Instant anticipatory bail application has been filed by accused-petitioner under the apprehension of his arrest in connection with FIR No.201/2024 registered at Police Station Masalpur, District Karauli for the offences punishable under Section 310(2) of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 3/25 of Arms Act. 3. Heard learned public prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 4. Taking into consideration the allegation leveled against the accused-petitioner that he has made a robbery of cash amount of Rs.3,50,000/-; the matter is under investigation and his custodial interrogation may not be denied; offences alleged against the accused-petitioner are triable by Court of Sessions, and the well- [2025:RJ-JP:23659] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3249/2025] settled principle of law that anticipatory bail is to be granted only in exceptional circumstances, where the court is prima facie satisfied that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated and is unlikely to misuse the liberty if granted bail as authoritatively laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Jai Prakash Singh v. State of Bihar [(2012) 4 SCC 379] and reaffirmed in State of Madhya Pradesh v. Pradeep Sharma [AIR 2014 SC 626], this Court finds it difficult to discern, at this stage, that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this matter nor any exceptional circumstances are there, in the present case. 5. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application stands dismissed. (SUDESH BANSAL (V. J.)),J Tushar/52