SARWAN SINGH THROUGH HIS LRS v. KISHOR KUMAR ALIAS KISHOR CHAND AND ANOTHER
CR/6185/2025 · 2025-09-08
Amarinder Singh Grewal
Civil Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 98231 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 98231 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CR-6185-2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 128 CR-6185-2025 Date of Decision: 08.09.2025 Sarwan Singh since deceased through his Legal Heirs and others ....Petitioners VERSUS Kishor Kumar @ Kishor Chand and Another ...Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL
Present: Mr. Vishal Sharma Haritwal, Advocate, for the petitioners. *** AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL
, J. (ORAL)
1. The present revision petition has been instituted under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of appropriate directions to the learned Additional District Judge, Karnal for expeditious disposal of Civil Appeal No.284 of 2023 titled as “Sarwan Singh since deceased through his LRs Vs. Kishor Kumar @ Kishor Chand”.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent had filed a civil suit for mandatory injunction with consequential relief of permanent injunction against the defendant-Sarwan Kumar and his sons which was dismissed by the trial Court on 20.05.2022. The original defendant-Sarwan Kumar unfortunately expired on 15.06.2022, leaving behind the present petitioners as his legal heirs. Thereafter, the petitioners filed civil appeal along with applications for condonation of delay and for stay of the decree. The grievance of the petitioner is that learned appellate Court has been adjourning the matter in stereotype manner without deciding these applications and as a result thereof, the execution Court has issued the ANIL KUMAR 2025.09.10 17:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CR-6185-2025 2 warrants of possession in Execution No.308/2022. Ultimately, he prays for deciding the civil appeal as expeditiously as possible.
3. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice is not being issued to respondent as it would delay the proceedings besides entailing additional expenses to the respondent.
4. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the paper book.
5. Considering the aforesaid facts, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of and learned Additional District Judge, Karnal, is directed to decide the Civil Appeal No.284/2023 along with applications as expeditiously as possible.
(AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) 08.09.2025 JUDGE anil Whether speaking/ reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No ANIL KUMAR 2025.09.10 17:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document