BIGAN YADAV ALIAS BIGAN KUMAR YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./2116/2025 · 2025-04-02
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9823 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9823 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
(2025:JHHC:10117) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No.2116 of 2025
------ Bigan Yadav @ Bigan Kumar Yadav, aged 30 years, S/o Vishnu Prasad Yadav @ Vishundev Yadav, R/o Village-Serandag, P.O.- Serandag, P.S.-Herhanj, Dist.-Latehar.
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Ajay Kr. Pathak, Addl.P.P.
------
Order No.02 Dated- 02/04/2025
Heard the parties.
Apprehending his arrest in connection with Herhanj P.S. Case No.32 of 2024 instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 316(5), 318(3), 319(2), 318(4), 336(3), 340(2) of the B.N.S, 2023, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has opened an account in the name of the informant and was withdrawing money from the same and the petitioner has also opened a fake account in the name of Lilawati Devi and illegally withdrew money. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the petitioner has replied to the notice under Section 35(3) of the B.N.S.S. It is next submitted that the IO has recorded the statement of the Branch Manager of S.B.I, Herhanj Branch wherein the Branch Manager has stated that it is not possible to open any account without furnishing identity documents and the fingerprints of the account holder to the bank. It is also submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail.
Learned Addl.P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for
anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrendering, he will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.10,000/- as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Latehar in connection with Herhanj P.S. Case No.32 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/