IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4354 of 2015 ====================================================== 1. Sheo Kali Devi and Anr wife of Shri Jaleshwar Prasad 2. Jaleshwar Prasad S/o Late Ram Sundar Prasad Both residents of village - Sakari, P.S. - Bhagwanpur Hat, District - Siwan. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar and Ors 2. The Additional Member, Board of Revenue, Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna. 3. The Collector, Siwan. 4. The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Maharajganj, District - Siwan. 5. Sudish Singh S/o Late Bharat Singh 6. Ramji Singh S/o Late Fulena Singh 7. Babban Singh S/o Shri Rajgrih Singh All residents of village - Sakari, P.O. - Sikatia, P.S. - Bhagwanpur Hat, District - Siwan. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binod Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ajay- Ga12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 3 25-11-2025 Heard the parties. 2. The present application has been preferred for the following relief(s): for issuance of a writ of certiorari or writs in the nature thereof or any other appropriate writs/orders/directions for quashing order dated 03.04.2014 passed in B.L.T.Case No.698/2013 by the Hon'ble Chairman under the Bihar Land Tribunal Act dismissing the application filed u/s 9 of the Bihar Land Tribunal Act by the petitioners which was filed for quashing order dated Patna High Court CWJC No.4354 of 2015(3) dt.25-11-2025 2/2 10.07.2001 of the DCLR, Maharajganj, Siwan in L.C.Case No.24/2000; order dated 10.04.2005 of the learned Collector, Siwan passed in Pre-emption Appeal Case No.279/2001 and order dated 8.12.2011 of the Additional Member, Board of Revenue, Bihar, Patna passed in Board Revision Case No.104/2005. This writ petition is also for remitting the matter back to the Hon'ble Land Tribunal, Patna to decide the claim of the petitioners on merit. 3. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with the new law relating to pre-emption matter, their petition has become infructuous. 4. Accordingly, the same is disposed of as infructuous. Vijay Singh/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U