Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9822 (JHR)

JITENDRA MANDAL v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3013/2025 · 2025-07-01

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:17435] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.3013 of 2025 ------ Jitendra Mandal, aged about 26 years, son of Sunil Mandal, resident of Village- Murlipahari, P.O.- Narayanpur, P.S.- Karmatar, District- Jamtara, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Mahesh Tewari, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shailendra Kr. Tiwari, Spl.P.P ------ Order No.03 Dated-01-07-2025 I.A. No.7334 of 2025 Heard the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this interlocutory application has been filed for early hearing. Since the hearing of this bail application is taken up today, hence, this interlocutory application is disposed of being infructuous. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) B.A. No.3013 of 2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Jamtara (Cyber Crime) P.S. Case No.10 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Section 111(2)(ii), 317(2), 319(2)/318(4)/338/336(3)/340(2)/3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66B/66C/66D of I.T. Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in cyber crime. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is also submitted that only because three mobile phones along with SIM Cards were recovered from the possession of the petitioner, he has been implicated in this case. It is then submitted that there is no money trail involved in this case. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 02.02.2025 as is evident from para-15 of the instant bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-14 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the co- accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 12.06.2025 passed in B.A. No.4019 of 2025. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner also undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Jamtara in connection with Jamtara (Cyber Crime) P.S. Case No.10 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/