HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14143 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant petition has been filed by petitioner to direct the respondent no. 2 to decide the petitioner's representation/application dated 21.04.2025 within stipulated period. 3. Petitioner is complainant and as a third party she is here before this Court for a direction to the respondent no. 2 to consider her complaint and dispose of same in accordance with law. Her complaint has been made against the respondent no. 5 and in my considered view such complaint cannot be directed to be examined in service jurisdiction by this Court at the instance of a third party. Petitioner does not have any stake in the employment of establishment and no public interest litigation is entertainable in service matter. 4. In view of the above, I decline to entertain this petition. Petitioner may have alternative remedy to approach the appropriate forum with his grievance. 5. Subject to the aforesaid observations, this petition is consigned to record. September 25, 2025 Sharad/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajneesh Kumar Sharma, Vinod Shankar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Ajit Kumar,J.) Smt. Chunmun .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHARAD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad