Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9821 (ALL)

SATYA PRAKASH @ SATTO v. STATE OF U.P.

NABAIL/669/2025 · 2025-02-12

Deepak Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:20747 Court No. - 70 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 669 of 2025 Applicant :- Satya Prakash @ Satto Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Raghubir Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Vipin Chandra Pal Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for applicant, learned A.G.A. for State and perused the record. 2. The instant Anticipatory Bail Application has been filed with a prayer to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant in Case Crime No.327 of 2024, under Sections 74, 191 (1), 115(2), 352, 351, 109 (1) BNS, P.S. Kirawali, District Agra, during pendency of trial. 3. After arguing the matter to some extent, learned counsel for applicant submits that present anticipatory bail application may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file a bail application which may be decided in view of law laid down by Supreme Court in "Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in 2021 SCC OnLine SC 922" to which learned A.G.A. has no objection. 4. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the applicant, namely, Satya Prakash @ Satto appears before the trial court within two weeks from today and applies for regular bail, the same shall be decided expeditiously, in view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in Satender Kumar Antil (supra). 5. For the period of two weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the Court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against him. 6. The petition is disposed of accordingly. Order Date :- 13.2.2025 Meenu Singh Digitally signed by :- MEENU SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad