Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 98207 (ALL)

SHAKAL PARA v. MOHD. YUSUF AND 2 OTHERS

A227/11676/2025 · 2025-09-23

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11676 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: "Issue an order or direction to direct the trial court to decide the Suit No.397 of 2018 (Shakal Para Vs. Mohd. Yusuf and Others), under Sections 31 and 38 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 pending in the court of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Court No.3, Basti, within stipulated time." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the aforementioned suit is pending since 2018 for adjudication. He prayed that the same may be decided expeditiously. 4. No useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. The present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Court No.3, Basti to consider and decide the aforementioned suit of the petitioner, in accordance with law, expeditiously, from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the respondents, after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and after giving a reasonable opportunity of leading Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ravindra Prakash Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : Shakal Para .....Petitioner(s) Mohd. Yusuf And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) evidence in respect of their case provided that there is no other legal impediment. September 24, 2025 Priya A227 No. 11676 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRIYA KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad