[2025:RJ-JP:15684] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 634/2025 1. Veersingh @ Beenu Son Of Gajsingh @ Gariba, Resident Of Bilauni Police Station Kanchanpur District Dholpur (At Present In District Jail Dholpur) 2. Shyame @ Shyamsingh Son Of Ramcharan, Resident Of Bilauni Police Station Kanchanpur District Dholpur (At Present In District Jail Dholpur) (At Present In District Jail Dholpur) ----Appellants Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp 2. Bhopat Son Of Hansa, Resident Of Bilauni Police Station Kanchanpur District Dholpur ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Anil Jain with Mr. Dushyant Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Judgment 08/04/2025 1. This criminal appeal under Section 14A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter to be referred as 'the SC/ST Act’) has been filed on behalf of the appellants being aggrieved with the order dated 27.02.2025 passed by the learned Special Judge S.C./S.T. (Prevention of Atrocities Cases), Dholpur (hereinafter to be referred as ‘trial court’) in FIR No. 276/2022 registered at Police Station Kanchanpur, Dholpur for the offence under Sections 143, 323, 341, 307, 354, 376, 511, 504 IPC, Section 3 (1) (s), 3(2) [2025:RJ-JP:15684] (2 of 3) [CRLAS-634/2025] (Va) of SC/ST later on converted under Section 143, 323, 341, 307, 504, 325 IPC and Section 3(1)(s), 3(2)(Va) of SC/ST Act whereby the trial court has dismissed the bail application filed on behalf of the appellant. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellants and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material on record. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that similar allegations were levelled against co-accused Arvind in the FIR and the co-ordinate Bench of this Court has allowed his bail application. He further submits that investigation/trial of the case may take considerable time. Therefore, on the same facts, the appeal presented by the present appellants may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the prayer made on behalf of the appellants. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to allow the appeal filed by the appellants under Section 14-A(2) of SC/ST Act. 6. Accordingly, this criminal appeal filed under Section 14-A(2) of SC/ST Act is allowed and order dated 27.02.2025 passed by the learned trial court is set aside. It is directed that appellants- Veersingh @ Beenu Son Of Gajsingh @ Gariba, and Shyame @ Shyamsingh Son Of Ramcharan shall be released on bail provided each of them executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for their appearance before that [2025:RJ-JP:15684] (3 of 3) [CRLAS-634/2025] court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J bmg/220