CRM-M-59073- IN THE H (235) BHOLA @ MOH STATE OF HAR CORAM: HON Present: Mr. Mr. A MANISHA BATR 1. The 483 of Bharatiya N of regular bail in under Sections 10 <BNS=) and Sec Palwal. 2. The complaint submitt of 20.06.2025, he uncle and was hav The petitioner alon were occupants o -2025 (O&M) 1 THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A CHANDIGARH MOHIT Versus
HARYANA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANIS Devender Kumar, Advocate for t Mr. Aditya Pal Singla, AAG, Haryana ****
BATRA, J. (ORAL)
The instant petition has been filed atiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in case arising out of FIR No.17 ns 109(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya N Section 25 of Arms Act, 1959 at P The aforementioned FIR was registe ubmitted by complainant Dharmender 25, he alongwith one Manoj was stan as having conversation when one i20 er alongwith co-accused Dalu @ Dalc ants of the said vehicle. The petitio JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH
CRM-M-59073-2025 (O&M) Date of decision : 10.02.2026 ... Petitioner ...Respondent ANISHA BATRA
e for the petitioner aryana by the petitioner under Section , 2023 (for short <BNSS=) for grant 177 dated 21.06.2025 registered atiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short 59 at Police Station Hodal, District registered on the basis of a written ender, alleging that on the evening standing outside the house of his i20 make Car stopped near them. Dalchand and one unknown youth, petitioner and co-accused Dalu @ M) 2026 oner
dent
ction grant tered short strict ritten ning f his hem. , @ AMIT SHARMA 2026.02.11 13:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-59073- Dalchand, fired 4 but both of them h CCTV camera ins to old rivalry, the taking action in th 3. After The petitioner an disclosure stateme also got recovered of countrymade pi stands completed. 4. It is a falsely implicated anyone in the alle does not pertain t firearm has been take considerable any useful purpos therefore, argued t 5. Status counsel has argue attempt to kill the are serious in na -2025 (O&M) 2 ired 4-5 shots with firearm upon the co them had a narrow escape. The entir ra installed in the vicinity. The comp the petitioner and the co-accused tr n in the matter. After registration of FIR, investigatio er and co-accused were arrested on tatements admitting their involvemen overed the vehicle used at the time of ade pistol had been effected from the c leted. t is argued by learned counsel for t licated in this case. No injury whats he alleged incident. The car which rtain to him and a false recovery has been recovered from him. He is in cus erable time to conclude. His further urpose. He is on bail in other cases gued that he deserves to be released on Status report and custody certificate argued that the petitioner alongwith ill the complainant and his companion in nature. There are chances of the complainant and his companion e entire incident was captured in the complainant further alleged that due sed tried to kill him. He prayed for stigation proceedings were initiated. ted on 10.07.2025. They suffered vement in the crime. The petitioner ime of occurrence whereas recovery m the co-accused. Investigation now l for the petitioner that he has been whatsoever had been sustained by hich has been recovered from him ry has been effected from him. No custody since long. The trial will urther incarceration would not serve cases registered against him. It is, ased on bail. icate have been filed. Learned State gwith the co-accused has made an panion. The allegations against him es of petitioner9s intimidating the nion n the t due d for ated. fered ioner very now been by him No l will serve It is, State e an t him the AMIT SHARMA 2026.02.11 13:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-59073- witnesses or absco petition does not d 6. This C for both the parties 7. The p not required for fu time to conclude s witness has been incarceration shou rule and jail is an punitive. Taking trial will take tim without meaning t the considered opi 8. Acco be released on ba satisfaction of the concerned and fur to contact the com indirectly make a with the facts of th -2025 (O&M) 3 r absconding, if extended benefit of ba s not deserve to be allowed. This Court has heard the rival submis parties at considerable length. The petitioner is in custody for a per further investigation. The trial wi lude since only charges have been fra been examined. It is well settled pr n should not be replica of post-convic l is an exception. Moreso, detention aking into consideration the above di ke time to conclude and the attendan ning to make any comment on the me ed opinion that the petitioner has made Accordingly the petition is allowed a on bail, subject to his furnishing per of the learned trial Court/Chief Judici nd further subject to his abiding by th e complainant and other material witn ake any inducement, threat or prom ts of the case. t of bail. It is thus, stressed that the ubmissions made by learned counsel r a period of over 07 months. He is trial will obviously take considerable en framed so far and no prosecution tled proposition of law that pre-trial conviction sentencing and bail is the tention prior to trial should not be ove discussed facts, the fact that the tendant facts and circumstances but the merit of the case, this Court is of s made out a case for grant of bail. wed and the petitioner is ordered to ng personal and surety bonds to the Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate by the condition that he will not try al witnesses and shall not directly or promise to any person acquainted t the unsel e is rable ution al s the t be t the s but is of ed to o the trate t try ly or inted AMIT SHARMA 2026.02.11 13:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-59073- 9. In the petitioner, it shal application seekin 10. Since any, is rendered in 10.02.2026 Amit Sharma


-2025 (O&M) 4 In the event of there being any FIR t shall be open to the respondent to seeking cancellation of bail. Since the main petition has been all ered infructuous.
(MA Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes 
 

y FIR/complaint lodged against the dent to seek redressal by filing an een allowed, pending application, if (MANISHA BATRA)
JUDGE
Yes/No
t the g an n, if AMIT SHARMA 2026.02.11 13:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.