Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9817 (UTT)

ABHISHEK AND ORS v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/872/2024 · 2025-06-04

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.872 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Tapan Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, learned AGA for the State. 3. Mr. Parth Tamta, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Bhuwan Bhatt, learned counsel for respondent no.3. 4. Learned counsel for the State made a statement on instructions that after investigation, charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioners on 30.01.2025. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute this fact and submits that he would challenge the charge-sheet in the appropriate proceedings before the appropriate forum. 6. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the parties, the present criminal writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, it is open to petitioners to challenge the charge- sheet in appropriate proceedings, before the appropriate forum. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 04.06.2025 AK