JAI PRAKASH AND ANOTHER v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS
EX.PT/56/2023 · 2025-04-25
Ajay Mohan Goel
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9815 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9815 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:HHC:11109
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Exe. Pet. No. 56 of 2023
Decided on: 25.04.2025 Sh. Jai Prakash and another
… Petitioners
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and another … Respondents
Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioners : Ms. Babita Kumari, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Additional
AG.
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral)
Learned Additional Advocate General submits that Work Charge Status stands conferred upon the petitioners and as far as calculation of consequential benefits etc. is concerned, some reasonable time be granted to them. These proceedings are accordingly closed but with the observation that let needful be done by the Authorities within a period of three months from today, failing which the petitioner is at liberty to revive these proceedings by way of appropriate application.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge April 25, 2025 (narender)
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?