IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 121 CWP-26415-2025 Date of Decision: 05.09.2025 KAMALJIT KAUR ...Petitioner Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS …Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Tapish Kumar Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Deepak Malhotra, Addl. Standing Counsel with Mr. Brijesh Vashist, Jr. Panel Counsel for U.T. Chandigarh Mr. Vikas Chatrath, Advocate for respondent-SBI *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondent to revise her pension. 2. The petitioner is widow of Late Sh. Joginder Singh. She is entitled to family pension, however, respondent despite death of her husband are crediting pension in her husband’s account. She claims that she has already informed authorities. They are not releasing family pension. 3. Mr. Vikas Chatrath, Advocate, who is present in Court on behalf of respondent-SBI and Mr. Deepak Malhotra, Addl. Standing Counsel on behalf of respondent-U.T. Administration, submit that the competent authority would look into the matter and do the needful within DEEPAK BISSYAN 2025.09.05 17:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-26415-2025 -2- one month from today. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent-SBI pointed out that direction be issued to Assistant General Manager, CPCC, SBI Sector-5, Panchkula being the concerned authority. 5. In the wake of statement of both sides, the instant petition stands disposed of. 6. Let the needful be done by branch concerned within one month from today, in accordance with law. 7. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 05.09.2025 Deepak DPA Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No DEEPAK BISSYAN 2025.09.05 17:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document