Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9814 (AP)

BOPPANA MURALI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/5537/2025 · 2025-08-12

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010109052025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 5537/2025 Between: 1. BOPPANA MURALI, S/O.SEETHARAMANJANEYULU, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC.CULTIVATION AND BUSINESS, R/O.D.NO.2-22- 208, PLOT NO.132, JAYANAGAR COLONY, KUKATPALLY, HYDERABAD. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY - HOME, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI AT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE SUBDIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, GUDIVADA, SUB-DIVISION, GUDIVADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NANDIVADA POLICE STATION, NANDIVADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. NERUSU VENKATA VEERAJANEYULU, S/O.RADHA KRISHNA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCC.FORMER, R/O.TAMIRISA VILLAGE, NANDIVADA, NANDIVADA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the 4th respondent in not considering the petitioner representation dated 18.02.2025 requesting to provide police aid for catching the fish from the petitioner ponds in an extent of Ac.8.91 cents covered in R.S.No.471, 472-B, 473, 272-2, 279-1B, 278-2 and 472-A2 of Tamirisa Village, Nandivada Mandal, Krishna District though an injunction order dated 23.02.2024 in I.A.No. 117/2024 in O.S.No.21/2024 granted in his favour by the Hon'ble Principal Junior Civil Judge, Gudivada, Krishna District as illegal and arbitrary and violation of Articles 19, 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 3 and 4 to provide police aid and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to grant interim direction directing the 4th respondent to consider the representation dated 18.02.2025 requesting to provide police aid for catching the fish in an extent of Ac.8.91 cents covered in R.S.No.471, 472-B, 473, 272-2, 279-1B, 278-2 and 472-A2 of Tamirisa Village, Nandivada Mandal, Krishna District, pending disposal of the above writ petition, and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to receive the Counter Affidavit on record by allowing the Leave Petition in the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. B V ANJANEYULU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. NAGA PRAVEEN VANKAYALAPATI The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the 4th respondent in not considering the petitioner representation dated 18.02.2025 requesting to provide police aid for catching the fish from the petitioner ponds in an extent of Ac.8.91 cents covered in R.S.No.471, 472-B, 473, 272-2, 279-1B, 278-2 and 472-A2 of Tamirisa Village, Nandivada Mandal, Krishna District though an injunction order dated 23.02.2024 in I.A.No. 117/2024 in O.S.No.21/2024 granted in his favour by the Hon'ble Principal Junior Civil Judge, Gudivada, Krishna District as illegal and arbitrary and violation of Articles 19, 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 3 and 4 to provide police aid and pass....…” 2. Heard Sri B.V.Anjaneyulu, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader, Sri V.Naga Praveen, learned counsel for the respondent No.4. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the police are not considering the representation dated 18.02.2025, for providing police aid for catching fishes. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent No.4 would submit that the petitioner already moved police aid petition before the trial Court and parallel to that the present writ petition is filed. 5. Considering the submissions made, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 13.08.2025 MH HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 200 W.P.No.5537 of 2025 Dated: 13.08.2025 MH