WAQAR AHMED KHURSHID v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CWP/26443/2025 · 2025-09-08
Harsimran Singh Sethi, Vikas Suri
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 98138 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 98138 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-26443-2025 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
116 CWP-26443-2025 (O&M)
Date of Decision :08.09.2025 Waqar Ahmed Khurshid ...Petitioner
Versus State of Haryana and others
...Respondents CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present: Petitioner in person. * * * Harsimran Singh Sethi, J. (Oral)
1. In the present petition, the prayer of the petitioner is that respondent No.5 namely, Zakariya Khan son of Saheed Ahmed, who was elected as a member of the Zila Parishad, District Nuh from Ward No.17, was ineligible keeping in view the provisions of Section 175 (N) read with Section 177 of the Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 as he was in unauthorized possession of the Panchayat land.
2. The petitioner, who appears in person submits that a representation dated 01.07.2025 (Annexure P/4) has already been submitted before the authorities concerned, which is not being decided by the respondents hence, he will be satisfied in case, an appropriate direction is issued to the competent authority to decide the said representation raising claim qua the ineligibility being suffered by respondent No.5 namely, Zakariya Khan in a time bound manner.
AARTI SHARMA 2025.09.09 17:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-26443-2025 (O&M) -2-
3. Notice of motion.
4. Ms. Anu Pal, Addl. A.G. Haryana accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State and on instructions from Mr. Ajit Singh, BDPO, Ferozepur Jhirka, District Nuh, submits that the representation dated 01.07.2025 (Annexure P/4) is already being looked into by the Sub Divisional Magistrate of the concerned area and appropriate order on the same will be passed by the competent authority within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
5. Petitioner, who appears in person submits that keeping in view the statement made by learned counsel for the respondent-State, present petition may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further.
6. Ordered accordingly.
7. Civil miscellaneous application pending, if any, is also disposed of.
(HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE
(VIKAS SURI) September 08, 2025 JUDGE
aarti Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No AARTI SHARMA 2025.09.09 17:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document