lN THE HIGH COURT-OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE T4wENTY SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH, edng THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE : PRESENT: '&.i THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2327 OF 2025 Betwee n : Tadishetti Naga Mahendra, S/o Raghava Rao, Aged about 30 years, R/o Door No. 7-455/64, Mangalagiri Post and Mandal Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. ...Petitioner/Accused No.ll AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Through the Station House Officer, Mangalagiri Town Police Station, Guntur District, Represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravati. ...Respondent Petition under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (438 of Cr.P.C), praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in support of the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Station House Officer, Mangalagiri Town Police Station, Guntur District to release the Petitioner/Accused No.ll on Bail, in the event of his arrest in connection with the Crime No.373/2024 on the file of Mangalagiri Town Police Station, Guntur District. Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri V R Maheswara Rao Paleti Counsel for the Respondent : Public Prosecutor. The Court made the following ORDER: APHCO10109612025 lN THE HIGH COURTOFANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATl (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T IVIALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2327/2025 Between : Tadishetti Naga Mahendra ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND The State Of Andhra ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Pradesh Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1.V R MAHESWARA RAO PALETI Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: The Criminal Petition, under Section 482 of the BNSS, is filed on behalf of the petitioner/Accused No.ll to grant anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No.373 of 2024 of Mangalagiri Town Police Station, Guntur District. 2. A case has been registered against the petitioner herein and others for the offences punishable under sections 420, 406, . 467, 468, 471 and 506 read with 34 lPC. 3. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 15.ll.2023, at about 4.00 p.m., the defacto complainant, who is an employee of NMDC, Kirandole Town, Chattishghad State, met Al in the month of November, 2023. The Al told deceitful words to the defacfo complainant that he was working in the Prisons department and has 30 acres Of land. ln this connection, the AI cheated the defacto complainant by using some fake names of Honlble High Court Judges and also created fake documents iiE| `'- I c-><y E wI-th fake names of Hl-gh Court Judges and forged signatures Ion their names to provide a steno job in the High court. The defacto complainant beII'eVed the words Of Al and transferred a sum of Rs.59,06,100/-to accused through Bank Account, Phone pay, Google pay, NEFT, RTGS and net bankI-ng. Later defacto complajnant came to know that the accused cheated hl'm. when the defacto complainant asked the accused about the matter, then the accused sent the scary photos and sent fake documents to the defacto complaI'nant'S WhatSaPP number and threatened to kill him wI'th the Support Of Other accused. 4. Heard. Perused the record. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Petitioner hereI'n iS nothing tO dO With the activI'tieS Of Al and further submits that Al was granted bail by thI-S Court vide dated 20.02.2025 in CrI.P.No.1418 of 2025. He further submits that thI'S Court granted antI'CiPatOry bail tO A2 to A8 vide orders jn CrI.P.No.8837 of 2O24. 6. A perusal of the materI'al On record goes tO Show thatthe allegation made agal-nst Al is that he created fake documents wI'th a promise to provide J'ObS and COIlected an amount of Rs. 59,06,100/-by cheating innocent people. The accusation agal'nst the petitioner hereI®n/All is that Al purchased a car jn the name of the petjtI'Oner hereI'n. The learned counsel for the petjtI®Oner submits that there I®S nO relatiOnShI'P between Al and the PetI'tl'Oner herein to justify the purchase of a car I-n the petitioner's name. lt appears that the prosecution has not collected any materI'al tO Support their Case that Al purchased the car, which Its registered in the name of the petitioner herein. £--- 3 fr 7. Considering the nature of accusations made against the Petitioner and I-n absence Of any material in support of the accusations made against the petitioner, this court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner herein on the following conditions. i) The petitionerherein shall be enlarged on bail Ion the event of hI'S arrest, upon he furnishing a personal bond for Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), along with two sureties for a like sum each, to the satisfaction of the statl'on House Officer concerned. ii) The petitioner hereI'n iS further directed to co- operate With the investigation. Consequently, miscellaneous appll-cations pending, if any, shall stand closed. SD/-M.SRINIVAS ASSISTANT lSTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER FG To, 1. The Station House Officer, Mangalagiri Town Police Station, Guntur District. 2. One CC to Sri V R Maheswara Rao Paleti, Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor (AP) High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 4. One spare copy CVSS HIGH COURT TMR,J DATED : 27/03/2025 BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.2327 of 2025 ALLOWED