CPSW No. 230/2013 in SWP No. 786/2013 Page 1 of 2 Sr. No. 18 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Case:- CPSW No. 230/2013 in SWP No. 786/2013 Pronounced on:- 18.11.2025 Uploaded on:- 11.2025 Anmol Singh …. Petitioner(s) Through:- Mr. Asheesh Sharma, Advocate. V/s Suresh Kumar Sharma, Secy., Home and ors. …..Respondent(s) Through:- Ms. Priyanka Bhat, Advocate vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI, JUDGE ORDER(ORAL) 18.11.2025 1. In the instant contempt petition, petitioner herein has alleged non-compliance of order dated 10.04.2013, whereby, upon disposal of the writ petition filed by the petitioner being SWP No. 786/2013, the respondents came to be directed to consider the claim of the petitioner for appointment against the post of Constable in J&K Executive Police, strictly in accordance with the rules governing the field and to pass consideration order. 2. Compliance report has been filed by the respondents, wherein it is being stated that in compliance to the order passed by this Court, the claim of the petitioner was considered and on merits rejected, as a consequence whereof, a consideration order as well came to be passed, which is annexed with the compliance report. CPSW No. 230/2013 in SWP No. 786/2013 Page 2 of 2 3. Having regard to the record available on file, seemingly, the respondents/contemnors have complied with the order, non-compliance of which is alleged in the instant contempt petition. The contempt proceedings are, accordingly, closed. However, the petitioner shall be free to work out the remedy against the consideration order, if so advised. (JAVED IQBAL WANI) JUDGE JAMMU 18.11.2025 Ram Krishan Ram Krishan 2025.11.18 15:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document