IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 208 Civil Revision No.1303 of 2025 (O&M) Date of decision: February 10th, 2026 Niranjan Singh @ Naranjan Singh .....Petitioner Versus Surinder Pal .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr. Rajeev Dev Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sandeep Godara, Advocate for Mr. A.P.S. Rehan, Advocate for the respondent. VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that since the execution itself has been dismissed and thus the petitioner be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to seek alternate remedy in accordance with law. 2. Dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. 3. It is made clear that this Court has not opined on the merits of the alternate remedy which the petitioner proposes to institute and the Court concerned would consider the same independently, in accordance with law. 4. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. February 10th, 2026 (VIKAS BAHL) Puneet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No PUNEET SACHDEVA 2026.02.10 17:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh