Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 98099 (PNJ)

SANJAY VERMA v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/26402/2025 · 2025-09-05

Harsimran Singh Sethi, Vikas Suri

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-26402-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 109 CWP-26402-2025 Date of Decision :05.09.2025 Sanjay Verma ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present: Mr. Harsh Chopra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rahul Rampal, Addl. A.G. Punjab. * * * Harsimran Singh Sethi, J. (Oral) 1. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as the petitioner has a remedy to raise all the grievance as raised in the present petition before the Government of Punjab, before the decision is taken on the resolution impugned by the Government, the present petition may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further with liberty to the petitioner to raise all the issues/objections as raised before this Court before the Government of Punjab to contend that the resolution dated 27.08.2025 passed for ‘no confidence’ is incorrect and is in contravention of the Punjab Municipal Act, 1911 and the settled principle of law on the issue and prays that the respondents be directed to decide the validity of the said resolution in a time bound manner so that the petitioner does not suffer any prejudice. AARTI SHARMA 2025.09.08 17:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-26402-2025 -2- 2. Notice of motion. 3. Mr. Rahul Rampal, Addl. A.G. Punjab accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State and submits that an appropriate speaking order after giving due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner by dealing all the objections/issues to be raised by the petitioner as to whether the resolution in question is incorrect or can be accepted, will be passed by the Government within a period of 04 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order and the speaking order so passed will be conveyed to the petitioner for his information and necessary action. 4. Keeping in view the above, as prayed for by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of having been not pressed any further with liberty to the petitioner to raise all the objections/issues before the State Government of Punjab and the State will decide the same, as undertaken hereinbefore. 5. Civil miscellaneous application pending, if any, is also disposed of. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE (VIKAS SURI) September 05, 2025 JUDGE aarti Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No AARTI SHARMA 2025.09.08 17:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document