HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 36043 of 2025 Court No. - 75 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Rakesh Kumar Singh Chauhan, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri Vikas Sharma, learned State Law Officer, who appears for the State. 2. Though the application under Section 528 of BNSS has been preferred by the applicants for quashing the order dated 24.07.2024 and issued Non Bailable Warrant passed by Special Court 138 N.I. Act, Agra in Complaint No. 03 of 2019, (Anil Chaudhary Vs. Shri Rajprakash Garg and others) under section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881, Police Station-Nai Ki Mandi, District-Agra., however, as per the instructions received from his client, the applicants confine their relief to the extent of enlargement on bail before the court below in light of the judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation, (2022) 10 SCC 51. 3. Sri Vikas Sharma, learned State Law Officer has no objection to the same. 4. Considering the submissions raised at the Bar and the statements so sought to be made by them, the application stands disposed of while observing that in case appropriate proceeding in the form of bail application is preferred before the court below, then the same shall be decided with most expedition strictly in accordance with the law of the land keeping in view the judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). September 25, 2025 N.S.Rathour Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Neelam Singh Chauhan, Rakesh Kumar Singh Chauhan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Raj Prakash Garg And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- NIPENDRA SINGH RATHOUR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad