Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9808 (DEL)

RUBIKA ROSE v. VICKY VISHAL TUCK

CONT.CAS(C)/276/2024 · 2025-02-03

Manoj Jain

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~101 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 276/2024 & CM APPL. 31204/2024 RUBIKA ROSE .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Tushar Mudgil and Ms. Kritika Khurrana, Advocates. versus VICKY VISHAL TUCK .....Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN O R D E R % 03.02.2025 1. Mr. Tushar Mudgil, learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, submits that now there is a subsequent development in the matter as both the parties have mutually settled all their disputes and they have even got divorced by way of mutual consent. It is, therefore, submitted that the petitioner is no longer interested in pursuing with the present contempt petition. 2. In view of the above, the present contempt petition is disposed of as not pressed. MANOJ JAIN, J FEBRUARY 3, 2025 st This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/02/2025 at 14:39:12